Re: [linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)
From: Sebastien Metrot (meeloo_AT_noos.fr)
Date: Mon Dec 09 2002 - 20:32:14 EET


XLR = Xtended Linux Rack (everybody knows its freind Jack ;-)

Just my 0.02 cents of euros :)

Sebastien

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kjetil S. Matheussen" <k.s.matheussen_AT_notam02.no>
To: <linux-audio-dev_AT_music.columbia.edu>
Sent: Monday, 09 December, 2002 19:24
Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Plugin APIs (again)

> > > Tim Hockin wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > > Why? What is it that LADSPA does that would be so complicated
that an
> > > > > > instrument API must not support it?
> > > > >
> > > > > Nothing, OAPI or whatever will be a superset I imagine, but that
implies
> > > > > that LADSPA will still be simpler.
> > > >
> > > > yeah, and I want to make it easy for an OAPI (I HATE that name -
open to
> > > > ideas..) host to use LADSPA plugins. That is very important.
> > >
> > > Linux Audio Developers' More Sophisticated Plugin API (=LADMSPA) ? :-D
> > >
> > LADLUP - Linux Audio Developers' Less Unsophisticated Plugin API.
> >
> BAPULDAL - Linux Audio Developers' Less Unsophisticated Plugin API
Backwards.
>
> --
>


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Dec 09 2002 - 20:36:31 EET