Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Additional LADSPA hints
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Jan 16 2003 - 19:14:12 EET
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 10:19:38AM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> There's a syntactic ambiguity in the name AUDIO_RATE_CONTROL. Steve
> uses it to describe a Controller which runs at Audio Rate (i.e. sample
> clock speed). But, Janne understood it to mean a Controller *of* the
> Audio Rate, which is not allowed. Maybe a different name
> (CONTINUOUS_CONTROLLER?) would be clearer.
Yes, agreed. The names I used were just the ones I first thought of, there
not necceserily any good :)
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Jan 16 2003 - 19:20:03 EET