Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] softsynth SDK
From: Robert Jonsson (robert.jonsson_AT_dataductus.se)
Date: Tue Aug 19 2003 - 01:33:33 EEST
måndag 18 augusti 2003 23:26 skrev nikodimka:
> Heh :) two different answers :)
:)
Well, I guess they are the same but from two different angles.
MusE's softsynths could be discribed as the wrapper Steve mentions.
> >
> > They can, the softsynths that are internal to MusE work that way.
> >
..
> >
> > No, each LADSPA plugin could only be one voice, youd have to write a
> > wrapper to hand voice allocation and MIDI handling.
> >
> > - Steve
>
> So what do you guys think?
> Does LAD community need an SDK for rapid development of
> out of process, aseq-to-jack, (plus ladcca ?) synths?
> Or are there some reasons why this idea is inpractical?
I can't remember the beginning of this thread, though gut feeling is that
there are already quite a few projects in this vein.
If you truly want to do rapid synth development you should construct synths in
Pd or Max, or even one of the modular synths, e.g. galan, ssm, ams + probably
several others, Supercollider comes to mind since it was recently mentioned
here.
But, if you don't find what you "need" in the current flora of projects, you
are welcome to try, it's your own free time :)
/Robert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Aug 19 2003 - 05:02:58 EEST