Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] softsynth SDK
From: Frank Barknecht (fbar_AT_footils.org)
Date: Tue Aug 19 2003 - 11:06:58 EEST
Hallo,
nikodimka hat gesagt: // nikodimka wrote:
> >Well, why not extend some of the existing softsynths? That's what I
> >do: Because I'm too lazy to write gui code I write Pd externals. The
> >GUI part can be quickly done inside Pd (and every other user could do
> >their own). jMax or SSM also come to mind
>
> Its only a half of solution.
> Can I "compile" or "render" the resulting engine into single
> executable?
> I feel pretty uncomfortable when instead of using a small
> self-contained synth I have to load its guts into editing
> environment.
I don't quite see why you want or what you mean with "a single
executable". For example Pd is a single executable. It only loads and
runs the objects one uses in a certain patch. If the small Tk GUI of
Pd really is too much for a machine then it is possible to run without
it.
For a compiled language SFront might be used, where in the end the
synth description is actually compiled with a C compiler into a synth.
ciao
-- Frank Barknecht _ ______footils.org__
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Aug 19 2003 - 11:09:04 EEST