Re: [linux-audio-dev] another kernel patch?

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] another kernel patch?
From: Jack O'Quin (joq_AT_io.com)
Date: Tue Dec 02 2003 - 03:50:09 EET

Roger Larsson <roger.larsson_AT_norran.net> writes:

> But it is still a way to see that no client burns cycles where it should not -
> jackd would not start (or stop). And you _can_ get fewer context switches,
> but only if some client burns extra cycles.
>
> Compare:
>
> With jackd as highest priority:
> Context switches: A->jd->A->B->jd
>
> With jackd as lowest priority:
> Context switches: A->jd->B->jd

The actual JACK process cycle works like this:
  jd->A->B->jd 

-- 
  joq

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Dec 02 2003 - 03:49:32 EET