Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] +momentary, consolidated (ladspa.h.diff)
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Mar 09 2004 - 13:14:03 EET
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:50:03 +0100, Alfons Adriaensen wrote:
> Another aspect of this is that the period size set by the audio interface
> or JACK need not necessarily correspond to a soft synth's internal control
> rate. CSound is one example of this. The new AMS I'm currently thinking
> about will be another. In this case the designer has the choice of either
>
> - calling plugins at the real control rate, and allow the use of LADSPA
> control ports to carry LF signals (LF0, ENV, ...)
> - or call the plugins at a much lower rate, map LADPSA control ports
> to widgets only, and not allow them to be routed.
>
> The LADSPA spec does not clearly define which of the two is intended.
Thats true, I always got the impression it was ntended to be the first.
The envelope trackers from CMT are a good exmaple, audio in, control out.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Mar 09 2004 - 13:12:11 EET