Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA extension - Formal proposal.
From: Alfons Adriaensen (fons.adriaensen_AT_alcatel.be)
Date: Wed Mar 10 2004 - 14:30:41 EET
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 11:30:24AM +0000, Steve Harris wrote:
> In that case there is a bug in AudioTwingTwang, its as simple as that. I
> have no idea why people think they can get away with releasing
> non-conformant plugins *cough* ;) In many ways its worse than release
> buggy apps, because it can bring down other peoples software.
>
> Valid 1.0 LADSPA plugins are also valid 1.1 plugins. 1.2 should follow
> this trend.
I will endorse that 100 %. Hosts should not accept buggy plugins in order
to gain a 'competitive edge'. Those that do give IMHO a bad impression
of their own quality standards.
-- FA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Mar 10 2004 - 14:30:57 EET