Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA extension - Formal proposal.
From: Alfons Adriaensen (fons.adriaensen_AT_alcatel.be)
Date: Wed Mar 10 2004 - 14:37:25 EET
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 12:47:32PM +0100, Jan Weil wrote:
> Quoting Fons' proposal:
> If there are any ports using LADSPA_HINT_SWITCHED, then their
> label strings follow after all port names (i.e. the port names
> remain in their normal place). In this case the range of valid
> indices is increased by the number of labels defined. The labels
> are not included in PortCount.
>
> Label strings follow after all port names.
> Why shouldn't you be able to ignore them?
Yes, you can simply ignore them all. But if you ignore them on a per port
basis, then you still have to calculate how may you need to skip. No big
deak, but I'd be surprised if any host wants to do that.
-- FA
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Mar 10 2004 - 14:36:05 EET