Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] +well-known-ports -Latency (ladspa.h.diff)
From: Tim Goetze (tim_AT_quitte.de)
Date: Wed Mar 10 2004 - 17:22:31 EET
[Paul Davis]
>this is not an accurate description of the purpose of the port.
>
> Plugin authors should assume that hosts that care about plugin
> latency will read the latency value as often as they deem
> necessary. However, host authors should assume that the port
> value is only valid after a legal call to run() or run_adding()
> (i.e. the plugin is active when run() or run_adding() is
> called).
>
>the latency port was intended to allow sequencer hosts like ardour to
>do automatic latency compensation. it was not intended as a static
>piece of information.
i've replaced my misleading description with yours. no re-post, but
http://quitte.de/ladspa/ladspa.h.diff is up-to-date.
tim
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Mar 10 2004 - 17:26:15 EET