Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...
From: Paul Davis (paul_AT_linuxaudiosystems.com)
Date: Fri May 14 2004 - 19:45:34 EEST


>Why rule out XML? It's one of the few widely-used language groups
>that actually sorta meets both those requirements (*fairly* simple and
>*somewhat* human-readable). ;-)

Reactions to XML can be as strong as your feelings about C++ :)

Personally, I am fan of both of them, but I don't think that forcing
the use of one of the many XML parsing libraries into a LADSPA
application is a good thing. I think that Steve's simple tuple scheme
can be parsed very easily in C code without any fun and games, and the
file is human readable if not instantly understandable.

--p


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri May 14 2004 - 19:49:57 EEST