Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA proposal ...
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Fri May 14 2004 - 22:13:14 EEST
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 12:45:34 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> >Why rule out XML? It's one of the few widely-used language groups
> >that actually sorta meets both those requirements (*fairly* simple and
> >*somewhat* human-readable). ;-)
>
> Reactions to XML can be as strong as your feelings about C++ :)
>
> Personally, I am fan of both of them, but I don't think that forcing
> the use of one of the many XML parsing libraries into a LADSPA
> application is a good thing. I think that Steve's simple tuple scheme
> can be parsed very easily in C code without any fun and games, and the
> file is human readable if not instantly understandable.
*cough* its not my scheme, its a W3C standard.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri May 14 2004 - 22:11:04 EEST