Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Is ladspa actually la-dsp-a? Is JACK the ultimate solution?
From: Marek Peteraj (marpet_AT_naex.sk)
Date: Tue Jun 08 2004 - 14:17:25 EEST
Forgot to add...
<snip>
> ... infact if you look in many LADSPA plugins you will
> see theres really more going on than there appears to be.
True that you can't have an ideal isolation of all DSP techniques,
whether simple of complex ones. But still, LADSPAs are simple plugins as
the name itself suggests.
<snip>
> You mentioned JAMin - true that does use LADSPA plugins -
<snip>
> I just reused them (LADSPA plugins)
> because I hate fixing bugs in two places :)
Which is perfect. :)
There are two advantages to this:
1. one ladspa package - get them all -- no need to chase for several
ladspas on the net. It's going to get ugly soon with the increasing
number of dsp devs.
2. 100% reusable -- interesting and attractive DSP stuff doesn't need to
be bound to one application - see glame high/low/band pass filters for
example.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jun 08 2004 - 12:03:48 EEST