Re: [linux-audio-dev] Is ladspa actually la-dsp-a? Is JACK the ultimate solution?

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Is ladspa actually la-dsp-a? Is JACK the ultimate solution?
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Jun 08 2004 - 12:20:37 EEST


On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 01:17:25 +0200, Marek Peteraj wrote:
> Forgot to add...
>
> <snip>
> > ... infact if you look in many LADSPA plugins you will
> > see theres really more going on than there appears to be.
>
> True that you can't have an ideal isolation of all DSP techniques,
> whether simple of complex ones. But still, LADSPAs are simple plugins as
> the name itself suggests.

The API is simple, /not/ the plugins!

I think you're tarring all plugins with my brush. In 2000 I was basicly a
DSP novice, so all my early plugins are a bit simplistic.

- Steve


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jun 08 2004 - 12:13:41 EEST