Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Is ladspa actually la-dsp-a? Is JACK the ultimate solution?
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Jun 08 2004 - 12:18:47 EEST
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 06:54:32 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jun 2004 09:18:58 +0100
> Steve Harris <S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote:
>
> > [OOT] I used to think that a UI spec for LADSPA (to make it competetive
> > with VST) was a technological problem. I now thinks its a manpower issue
> > (I think Paul Davis pointed this out a couple of years ago :). Games
> > develpment has moved to the point where the graphics work is more
> > expensive than the software development, and I bet its not far off in
> > plugin / eyecandy app development. We have no, or almost no, graphics
> > people here.
>
> We don't necessarily need eyecandy, but the plain simple sliders provided
> by most of the gui toolkits would be MAJORLY useful.
I agree. I'm not rally fond of the "spinning cow" model of UI design, but
sensible layout and display would help immensly.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jun 08 2004 - 12:11:29 EEST