Re: [linux-audio-dev] Is ladspa actually la-dsp-a? Is JACK the ultimate solution?

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Is ladspa actually la-dsp-a? Is JACK the ultimate solution?
From: Marek Peteraj (marpet_AT_naex.sk)
Date: Tue Jun 08 2004 - 17:24:05 EEST


On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 12:11, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 01:52:02 +0200, Marek Peteraj wrote:
> > > JAMin is not a plugin. Its an app.
> >
> > Think about it.
> > A typical fx plugin takes audio as input does DSProcessing to the audio
> > and outputs that. What does JAMin do?
> > The whole purpose of JAMin is to do DSP. And if you make a send in
> > ardour... :)
>
> The point I didnt make is that JAMin /cannot/ be implemented efficiently
> as a set of plugins. The (majority, non-ladspa) DSP code is very
> intermingled, to make it run in realtime.

How much DSP code is non-ladspa in JAMin? (approx. in %-age?)

Marek


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jun 08 2004 - 15:12:25 EEST