Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Is ladspa actually la-dsp-a? Is JACK the ultimate solution?
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Jun 08 2004 - 16:43:48 EEST
On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 04:24:05 +0200, Marek Peteraj wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-06-08 at 12:11, Steve Harris wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 01:52:02 +0200, Marek Peteraj wrote:
> > > > JAMin is not a plugin. Its an app.
> > >
> > > Think about it.
> > > A typical fx plugin takes audio as input does DSProcessing to the audio
> > > and outputs that. What does JAMin do?
> > > The whole purpose of JAMin is to do DSP. And if you make a send in
> > > ardour... :)
> >
> > The point I didnt make is that JAMin /cannot/ be implemented efficiently
> > as a set of plugins. The (majority, non-ladspa) DSP code is very
> > intermingled, to make it run in realtime.
>
> How much DSP code is non-ladspa in JAMin? (approx. in %-age?)
90%
The non-ladspa DSP code is 3800 lines (not inc. libraries), the LADSPA code
(including preamble, not libraries) is < 400.
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jun 08 2004 - 16:37:37 EEST