Re: [linux-audio-dev] Is ladspa actually la-dsp-a? Is JACK the ultimate solution?

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Is ladspa actually la-dsp-a? Is JACK the ultimate solution?
From: Chris Cannam (cannam_AT_all-day-breakfast.com)
Date: Fri Jun 11 2004 - 10:50:21 EEST


On Thursday 10 Jun 2004 10:34 pm, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 11:57:06 +0200, torbenh_AT_gmx.de wrote:
> > > Automation in VST is pretty much broken AFAICT. It relys on
> > > explicit support from the plugins to work.
> >
> > i am tempted to say "not true" but i may miss something.
> >
> > - there is a setParameter() call on the plugin (so i can automate
> > it)
> > - the plugin calls me back if i do changes in the UI.
> >
> > what am i missing ?
>
> OK, I'm wrong - I was unde the impression that the UI could
> directly change/pass values in/to the plugin without telling the
> host.

It can, can't it? Torben's "the plugin calls me back" is how it's
intended to work, but there's nothing to enforce it. Still, if a
plugin said it was automatable but failed to do that, it would really
be the plugin that was broken.

Chris


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Jun 11 2004 - 10:25:53 EEST