Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] OSC for GUI-Engine communication
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Jul 28 2004 - 13:32:51 EEST
On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 11:34:48AM -0600, martin rumori wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 12:33:56PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> > >The question is, which implementation is best? All I can find is
> > >Steve's liblo, libosc++, and the 'official' OSC kit. What are the
> >
> > afaik, libosc++ just wraps the sdk distributed by stanford. and that
> > sdk is just a total nightmare. the 2nd worst code i have ever
> > read. use liblo.
>
> do you mean the sdk distributed by berkeley? if you're speaking about
> libOSC++ from stetson university (part of the wiretap project), it
> doesn't wrap the berkeley thing. when using the "fraunhofer" branch
> from cvs, it comes with some classes wrapping the unix network stuff
> (UDP and TCP).
>
> if you don't need bundles, I'd go with liblo, cause it's really
> lightweight.
I agree. Thought its now really only the API thats lightweight, the code
is growing a bit :(
- Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed Jul 28 2004 - 13:39:45 EEST