Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: This better not be patented...

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: This better not be patented...
From: Ralf Beck (musical_snake_AT_gmx.de)
Date: Thu Sep 16 2004 - 18:20:50 EEST

Next message: Ralf Beck: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: This better not be patented..."
Previous message: derek holzer: "[linux-audio-dev] P4 kernel patch/option against denormals"
In reply to: Juhana Sadeharju: "[linux-audio-dev] Re: This better not be patented..."
Next in thread: Jens M Andreasen: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: This better not be patented..."
Reply: Ralf Beck: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: This better not be patented..."

Universal Audios UAD card is in fact a GPU (MPACT2 chip), so using a GPU is
not that new.
Anyway, call it GPU, DSP, CPU or whatever else. They are chips supposed to run
whatever
algorithm you load up on them.
There is nothing new that could be patented.

Next message: Ralf Beck: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: This better not be patented..."
Previous message: derek holzer: "[linux-audio-dev] P4 kernel patch/option against denormals"
In reply to: Juhana Sadeharju: "[linux-audio-dev] Re: This better not be patented..."
Next in thread: Jens M Andreasen: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: This better not be patented..."
Reply: Ralf Beck: "Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: This better not be patented..."

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Sep 19 2004 - 15:33:15 EEST