On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 06:55:45PM -0600, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> In the case of JAMin it was dictated by our desire to use FFTW rather
> than writing our own FFT and trying to figure out how to divide the
> computation into relatively equal parts.
For Jamin, you have two channels, each one needs a Fwd and an Inv FFT,
so that would already be 4 approx. equal parts (assuming the FFT dominates
the work to be done).
-- FAReceived on Mon Jan 31 12:15:10 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 31 2005 - 12:15:10 EET