On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 07:49:42PM +0000, Chris Cannam wrote:
> For example, Rosegarden contains structure intended to support things
> like arbitrary layout engines for editing; multiple different layouts
> on the same music data; event-based systems that are not MIDI, and so
> on. Yet because it has taken so much development work just to do the
> basic MIDI and audio support that people expect from a sequencer, and
> because we are so few developers, most of this is still unused.
And unknown I suspect. If indeed the internals of Rosegarden offer so
much scope for new developments, they should make a good subject for a
presentation or even a workshop at LAC.
-- FAReceived on Thu Feb 3 04:15:08 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 03 2005 - 04:15:08 EET