On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 06:53:05AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> but anyway, i just wanted to note that tracks don't have to be
> considered as this kind of burden at all. when you get down to the
> core of it, tracks are a grouping mechanism, that's all.
agreed...
> and they
> don't group by using time relationships, but signal processing
> relationships.
Hmm, what then is a "channel"?
-- Paul Winkler http://www.slinkp.comReceived on Tue Feb 1 04:15:08 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 01 2005 - 04:15:08 EET