Dave Robillard wrote:
>On Fri, 2005-08-04 at 14:57 -0300, Juan Linietsky wrote:
>
>
>>The following are excuses:
>>
>>-Because we need core and interface separation, this way we warranty a
>>clean design and network transparency
>>-Because it would force both interface and core to be memory locked, as
>>a result of being a jack clients, forcing more physical memory to be used
>>-Because separating interface and core makes for a clear design.
>>
>>And I say, ALL THIS IS LIES. Every single of such reasons are of no
>>concern to musicans. If I just want to make music, I would not care
>>about any of such reasons. I'd just fire up an application and make
>>music. All that seems to me more like academia-speech than real reasons
>>
>>
>
>Maybe YOUR way of making music doesn't care. MINE does. Network
>transparency is important to me, and DSSI is f'ing wonderful, and 400
>thousand times better than VST for what I want to do.
>
>"ALL THIS IS LIES" because your opinion's different? Right.
>
>
>
Nop. just meant that these are not the reasons why we dont have
VST-Like plugins, just the philosophical views of some programmers.
>>You can believe them or not, but it's PROVEN that none of these are
>>needed to make music.
>>
>>
>
>It's PROVEN that computers aren't needed to make music too.
>
>Your point?
>
>
>
That simply means that in any other OS/Plugin systems, you dont really
need any of these things.
Received on Sat Apr 9 12:15:07 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 09 2005 - 12:15:08 EEST