On Monday 11 Apr 2005 23:19, Paul Davis wrote:
> the problem is that there is no single answer. if you want to run 1
> or 3 VSTi's then i would agree with chris' assessment (for now,
> anyway). but you cannot use this model to put a VST EQ on 12 tracks
> and a VST delay unit on 2 others and a VST looper on another. the
> architecture doesn't scale.
The VST-per-server implementation might not, but there's no very
compelling reason not to have multiple VSTs in a single server serving
multiple clients. That would be less reliable than a dssi-vst type
service can be, but no less reliable than fst, and it should scale
nearly as well. It's been on my todo list for ages...
Chris
Received on Tue Apr 12 04:15:14 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Apr 12 2005 - 04:15:15 EEST