Re: [linux-audio-dev] OpenGL + Audio = Bad Idea?

From: Ge Wang <gewang@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat May 21 2005 - 19:16:41 EEST

OpenGL + Audio can be a good thing. We at the SoundLab have been using
this combination in many of our apps. It is important to structure the
audio callbacks in such a way that it can operate independent of the main
render function. I have to jump on a plane to Vancouver (NIME2005), but
here are some apps that involves audio and opengl:

sndpeek:

     http://soundlab.cs.princeton.edu/software/sndpeek/
     (look at the audio callback vs. the render function in sndpeek.cpp)

rt_lpc:

     http://soundlab.cs.princeton.edu/software/rt_lpc/
     (see rt_lpc.cpp)

soon the audicle:

     http://audicle.cs.princeton.edu/

Hope this helps.

Best
Ge!

On Sat, 21 May 2005, Richard Spindler wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have a little Problem:
>
> I'm using OpenGL in my Program, in combination with OSS via portaudio.
> The Updates of the OpenGL display are triggered by the audio callback,
> protected using the available Methods of the GUI-Toolkit that I use
> (fltk).
>
> And I'm experiencing very strange effects, like: without Audio the
> OpenGL works fine. without the OpenGL, the audio works fine, however
> when used in combination, the Audio Thread (callback) stops very soon,
> and I have no Idea why?
>
> I used efence to discover wheater I'm screwing up memory somewhere,
> but I couldn't find anything. I ran valgrind, but it couldn't find
> something helpful either.
>
> I ran it from within gdb, but the program behaves correctly if run
> from gdb (heisenbug?). It even works better whenever I insert some
> cout's for debugging purposes.
>
> in gdb it also reports a signal like this when initializing the
> openGL, but I believe that might be propably unreleated.
>
> http://music.columbia.edu/pipermail/linux-audio-user/2004-October/016821.html
>
> BTW. I'm running an unmodified ubuntu warty.
>
> Any tips or pointers??
>
> Thanks
> Richard
>
> PS.: (writing this message led me to some more experiments ;) )
> I'm fairly sure that something is screwed up within thread
> syncronisation, because I can "fix" it by inserting a usleep() call at
> a certain position, but I do have a fairly hard time imagining what
> could be wrong. I'm considering to switch to blocking IO for Audio
> because, latency and stuff is not really an issue.
>
Received on Sat May 21 20:15:10 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 21 2005 - 20:15:11 EEST