On Mon, 13 Jun 2005, Jay Vaughan wrote:
> i mean .. i've been using linux since the minix-list post, and i'll be damned
> if i can keep up with all this ALSA/esd/OSS/jackd/artsserver voodoo that is
> expected of anyone wanting to get audio working in linux, at the same/similar
> degree of operational status as we see under OSX .. even though, i'm very,
> very eager to see linux function as a working audio platform. there's gotta
> be -some- way to get it all working, and i dont just mean "buy a Dell laptop"
I must admit, I had to double-check that I really am reading the year-2005
folder of linux-audio-dev, and not some old mails from the archives. ;)
Now that SuSE, Mandrake, Fedora and others have started to use dmix as the
default output plugin, basic desktop sound stuff should finally start to
work, as people expect, out of the box. If anything, rants like the recent
one from jwz, are a wake-up call for desktop/workstation-oriented distros
that sound is important. Details like configuring dmix and other plugins,
making sure the aoss-wrapper is used with OSS apps, etc are important...
As for the API-jungle, yup, that's a problem, but it's something really,
really hard to avoid in the FOSS world. Just look at the amount of
options for video output when you type "mplayer -vo help" -- no unified
API there either. That's not to say that we should give up, but
getting majority of developers behind a single API will not be easy...
But, but, this is just part of the whole package developers and users see.
Fortunately there are other areas where FOSS systems have strengths over
the closed competitors. And at least for me, FOSS systems still provide
better overall value... (also for desktop use).
-- http://www.eca.cx Audio software for Linux!Received on Tue Jun 14 12:15:08 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 14 2005 - 12:15:10 EEST