>In the absence of any scheduling mechanism, I don't think the
>MidiShare API could be re-built on top of the underlying Jack MIDI
>buffer transports system.
but .. what about having Jack just use MidiShare Events (the 'other
way around'), or is this a futile idea?
/hasn't seen the jack-midi code yet, so i don't know what i'm talking about..
-- ; Jay VaughanReceived on Mon Jun 20 16:15:04 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 20 2005 - 16:15:05 EEST