Re: [linux-audio-dev] All things LADSPA, your input please

From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Jun 28 2005 - 18:35:46 EEST

On Tue, Jun 28, 2005 at 05:16:15 +0200, Tim Goetze wrote:
> [Christoph Eckert]
>
> >I enjoy jack-rack with some EQ, chorus and reverb really a
> >great fun when plugging in my acoustic guitar.
> >
> >LADSPAS in ardour are really cool as well as using LADSPAS in
> >synths like ams or om directly (and om does use them
> >excessively).
> >
> >I agree that the GUI interfaces for LADSPAs are sometimes
> >suboptimal, but this is due to the name of LAD_S_PAs.
>
> Yes, simple is nice. However, the API's excessive verbosity and the
> 1.1 kludges sometimes tempt me to expand the S into other, more
> pejorative words.

Thats one point of view, but actually the LADSPA API is still pretty
cleen, in the grand scheme of things. Though it could be better of
course.

- Steve
Received on Thu Jul 7 16:15:52 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 07 2005 - 16:15:53 EEST