On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:56:47PM +0100, torbenh@email-addr-hidden wrote:
> > course it would be perfectly valid for netjack
> > to use little endian `on the wire'; but this would be like
> > putting my powerbook in little endian mode when playing a
> > wav file. sort of.
>
> so you say that i should not htonl the floats i copy from
> my net buffer to the jack-port ?
no, it was a joke.
> i doubt, this is a great performance impact.
i doubt that too.
> when i change the packet format next time, i could change that to byte
> swap on a PPC. but considering that PPCs are generally slower than x86
> nowadays, this would create more cpu load on a jack-network.
i don't think that's measurable either because the byte swap
is probably not the main source of overhead. besides, i'm on
ppc, so plz plz don't change it :)
thanks for netjack!
<sk>
Received on Wed Mar 15 00:15:07 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Mar 15 2006 - 00:15:07 EET