Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA processing: ams, om, ... Anything else?

From: Lars Luthman <larsl@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Mar 16 2006 - 21:01:49 EET

On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 21:26 +0300, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
> Are there alternatives for 'ams' and 'om'? My problems are:
>
> - 'ams' has not text fields to type-in controls values with needed precision,
> sliders are not sufficient,
> - 'om' engine has too many crashes (I see, it is normal, as the app is under
> development).

The engine has been rock solid for me for the last month or so (modulo a
few bugs that has been fixed quickly). What sort of crashes are you
seeing?

> Anything else?

I think Csound supports LADSPAs. 

-- 
Lars Luthman
PGP key:     http://www.student.nada.kth.se/~d00-llu/pgp_key.php
Fingerprint: FCA7 C790 19B9 322D EB7A  E1B3 4371 4650 04C7 7E2E

Received on Fri Mar 17 00:15:02 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 17 2006 - 00:15:02 EET