Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: MusE 0.8.1 released

On Tue, 2006-28-03 at 12:21 +1000, Loki Davison wrote:
> On 3/28/06, Florian Schmidt <mista.tapas@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > Hmm, i don't know what's up with that, but ./configure says "build
> > without lash support" and lateron it fails:
> >
> > /bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -g -fno-exceptions -Wall -W
> > -D_G
> > NU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -DQT_CLEAN_NAMESPACE -DQT_NO_COMPAT -I../..
> > -I../../m
> > use/widgets -I/usr/share/qt3/include -I.. -I../../synti -I../../muse/widgets
> > -DQ
> > T_SHARED -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -DQT_PLUGIN -fPIC -O3 -ffast-math
> > -fno-exceptions -
> > g -O2 -o fluidsynth.la -rpath /usr/local/lib/muse/synthi -module
> > -avoid-versio
> > n fluidsynti.lo fluidsynthgui.lo fluidsynthguibase.lo moc_fluidsynthgui.lo
> > ../li
> > bsynti/libsynti.la -lfluidsynth -lasound -lm -ldl -L/usr/share/qt3/lib
> > -lqt-mt -
> > lqui
> > grep: /usr/lib/libladcca.la: No such file or directory
> > /bin/sed: can't read /usr/lib/libladcca.la: No such file or directory
> > libtool: link: `/usr/lib/libladcca.la' is not a valid libtool archive
> > make[5]: *** [fluidsynth.la] Error 1
[snip]

> What lash is this anyway? is the modern, useful, actually handy for
> stuff lash as in http://www.nongnu.org/lash/ or the ladcca from dawn
> of time one?

0.5.0+ versions of LASH do not contain the phrase "ladcca" in any way (including
filenames).

>From a quick glance, neither does Muse 0.8.1, so I would assume this is a system
configuration problem.

-DR-
Received on Tue Mar 28 12:15:05 2006