On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:31:03 -0500
Dave Robillard <drobilla@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > What lash is this anyway? is the modern, useful, actually handy for
> > stuff lash as in http://www.nongnu.org/lash/ or the ladcca from dawn
> > of time one?
>
> 0.5.0+ versions of LASH do not contain the phrase "ladcca" in any way (including
> filenames).
>
> >From a quick glance, neither does Muse 0.8.1, so I would assume this is a system
> configuration problem.
I _do_ have cvs lash installed and debian's ladcca package, too. I
asssumed that because of the differing naming schemes i wouldn't run
into trouble. Seems i was wrong.
Flo
-- Palimm Palimm! http://tapas.affenbande.orgReceived on Tue Mar 28 12:15:16 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 28 2006 - 12:15:16 EEST