[Steve Harris]
>On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 11:26:27 -0400, Taybin Rutkin wrote:
>> I wonder why people include the protocol though? Using a java style
>> reverse DNS would have worked just fine:
>>
>> org.ladspa.ontology would have made sense too.
>
>Heh, that's a whole long argument. In brief: I should have put a copy of
>the ontology there (I meant to, just never got round to it), and that
>means that if/when a human finds a ladspa rdf file in the wild, they can
>type it in the namespace and find a copy of the ontology (with human
>readable notes in it) that explains what it is.
Which naïve me was expecting to find. A LADSPA ontology ... I love
the idea.
>If you use a tag: URI, or something else unresolvable then you dont have
>the option to look it up, ever. But, if you use HTTP then you can put
>something there, should you want to.
Please don't take it off your list of things to do.
Cheers, Tim
Received on Sat Apr 22 16:15:05 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 22 2006 - 16:15:07 EEST