On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 01:51:20PM +0200, Carlo Capocasa wrote:
>
> Well, that's a little like saying 'Would you rather go to McDonalds or
> that new burger joint nobody knows that might be a lot better but also
> might be a lot worse?'
>
> Perhaps if a new name is to be decided the benevolent dictator should
> simply decide a new name is to be given and it is up to us to decide which.
I don't think thats particularly helpful. There's not any agreement even
amongst people who dont think that LADSPA is a good name what a good name
is. So, I think saying "We can't use LADSPA2" wouldn't be especially
benevolent :)
That said, its up to the original LADSPA authors.
- Steve
Received on Sat Apr 29 00:15:02 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 29 2006 - 00:15:02 EEST