On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 08:57 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> OK, it seems like the consensus is clear to me. So far, most people want to
> use/keep LADSPA2. I ran it through a condorcet program, just to make sure,
> but it't not in doubt. FWIW, by my count the pure "acceptable" numbers
> came out as:
Most people who suggested we keed LADSPA said "LADSPA", not LADSPA2.
If we keep the name LADSPA, everything is going to have to say LADSPA2,
directory names, API calls...
"LADSPA2" looks like an ugly working name to me. --votes
-DR-
Received on Sat Apr 29 00:15:08 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Apr 29 2006 - 00:15:08 EEST