On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 22:39 +0100, pete wrote:
> Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 12:04 +0100, peter wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 07:07 -0400, Lee Revell wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 14:55 +0200, Esben Stien wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> ZAP Audio Plugins
> >>>>
> >>> I like this one, especially if the R. Crumb reference is intentional
> >>>
> >>>
> >> hmm ZAP. not only the least offensive recursive acronym i've seen but
> >> it's
> >>
> >
> > Why was 'peep' offensive? urbandictionary was of no help.
> different kind of offensive. recursive acro's are often contrived and stretched to fit.
> peep isn't SO bad and it's even palindromic if you go in for that sort of thing but ZAP
> just seems to have a lot going for it where peep seems a bit laboured.
I don't like ZAP at all. Sounds silly and childish.
</my2cents>
-DR-
Received on Sat May 13 08:15:01 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 13 2006 - 08:15:01 EEST