On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 15:26 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:39:30 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > I can make the plugin validating host check the latency primitively (eg
> > run a single sample through the buffer) and fail if it isn't reported
> > correctly, so we're sure the LADSPA latency woes are gone.
>
> What if it's a delay line? I think you have to reply on the concience of
> plugin programmers to get it right.
we could require plugins that delay the signal but are not latent to
have the required port (which would report zero)
Received on Tue Jun 20 20:15:02 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 20 2006 - 20:15:02 EEST