Re: [linux-audio-dev] LV2 update

On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 10:58 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 15:26 +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 09:39:30 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> > > I can make the plugin validating host check the latency primitively (eg
> > > run a single sample through the buffer) and fail if it isn't reported
> > > correctly, so we're sure the LADSPA latency woes are gone.
> >
> > What if it's a delay line? I think you have to reply on the concience of
> > plugin programmers to get it right.
>
> we could require plugins that delay the signal but are not latent to
> have the required port (which would report zero)

Hm, yeah, that would at least allow the verifier to check that plugins
without a latency port aren't latent, which is nice (and that's the main
problem anyway)

-DR-
Received on Wed Jun 21 04:15:04 2006