Re: [linux-audio-dev] What valgrind says

On Sat, 24 Jun, 2006 at 08:04PM -0400, Paul Davis spake thus:
> On Sat, 2006-06-24 at 23:26 +0100, james@email-addr-hidden-dot-dat.net wrote:
> > Hi peeps.
> >
> > I've just been running an app through valgrind and I'm getting a few
> > of these:
> >
> > ==11955== Syscall param write(buf) points to uninitialised byte(s)
> > ==11955== at 0x4D51BDB: (within /lib64/libpthread-2.4.so)
> > ==11955== by 0x4B27CDD: (within /usr/lib64/libjack.so.0.0.23)
> > ==11955== by 0x4B29434: jack_deactivate (in
> > /usr/lib64/libjack.so.0.0.23)
> > ==11955== by 0x4B2945F: jack_client_close (in
> > /usr/lib64/libjack.so.0.0.23)
> > ==11955== by 0x40402F: jackpart_close() (jackPart.cc:86)
> > ==11955== by 0x40235F: mainLoop() (sampleplayer.cpp:438)
> > ==11955== by 0x40237B: main (sampleplayer.cpp:444)
> > ==11955== Address 0x7FEFFE934 is on thread 1's stack
> >
> >
> > I can't see anything wrong on my part, so I thought I'd check with
> > people who know more than I before I tear my program apart.
> >
> > I also get them coming from jack_port_register, jack_activate and
> > jack_connect.
>
> they don't matter. they are the result of writing a byte to a FIFO to
> wake up an(other) client. the contents of the byte do not make any
> difference at any point.

Okey dokey. Cheers.

James
Received on Mon Jun 26 00:15:26 2006