On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 16:34 -0400, Dave Robillard wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-06-25 at 10:29 +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > Paul Davis wrote:
> >
> > > they don't matter. they are the result of writing a byte to a FIFO to
> > > wake up an(other) client. the contents of the byte do not make any
> > > difference at any point.
> >
> >
> > Regardless of whether this is a bug or not it would be really
> > nice if this could be fixed. Fixing it means that other people
> > valgrinding their apps which use the Jack libs don't see warnings
> > about Jack.
>
> ++
>
> The last thing we need is MORE valgrind warnings..
I have not looked closely at the code, but could it be considered an
information leak if you're using a byte of unitialized data?
Lee
Received on Mon Jun 26 00:15:36 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jun 26 2006 - 00:15:37 EEST