Re: [linux-audio-dev] ieee1394 deadlock on RT kernels

On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 21:44 +0200, Pieter Palmers wrote:
> Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 21:05 +0200, Pieter Palmers wrote:
> >> Lee Revell wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 16:51 +0200, Pieter Palmers wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Of course. My monday-morning bad temper is over by now, and I hope I
> >>>> didn't transfer it to any of you. I'll provide the panic, one way or
> >>>> another.
> >>>>
> >>> Can you reproduce the problem on a non-RT kernel?
> >>>
> >> No, it only occurs with RT kernels, and only with those configured for
> >> PREEMPT_RT. If I use PREEMPT_DESKTOP, there is no problem. (with
> >> threaded IRQ's etc... only switched over the preemption level in the
> >> kernel config).
> >>
> >> I've uploaded the photo's of the panic here:
> >> http://freebob.sourceforge.net/old/img_3378.jpg (without flash)
> >> http://freebob.sourceforge.net/old/img_3377.jpg (with flash)
> >>
> >> both are of suboptimal quality unfortunately, but all info is readable
> >> on one or the other.
> >
> > Can you add debug printk's before and after tasklet_kill() in
> > ohci1394_unregister_iso_tasklet to see where it locks up?
> >
> That's the first thing I did: the printk before tasklet_kill succeeds,
> the one right after the tasklet_kill doesn't.

OK that's what I suspected.

It seems that the -rt patch changes tasklet_kill:

Unpatched 2.6.17:

void tasklet_kill(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
        if (in_interrupt())
                printk("Attempt to kill tasklet from interrupt\n");

        while (test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
                do
                        yield();
                while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state));
        }
        tasklet_unlock_wait(t);
        clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state);
}

2.6.17-rt:

void tasklet_kill(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
        if (in_interrupt())
                printk("Attempt to kill tasklet from interrupt\n");

        while (test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
                do
                        msleep(1);
                while (test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state));
        }
        tasklet_unlock_wait(t);
        clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state);
}

You should ask Ingo & the other -rt developers what the intent of this
change was. Obviously it loops forever waiting for the state bit to
change.

Lee
Received on Tue Jun 27 00:15:03 2006