Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Extension for Extra GUI Data

From: Dave Robillard <drobilla@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Jun 27 2006 - 04:38:15 EEST

On Mon, 2006-06-26 at 15:03 +0200, Alfons Adriaensen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 01:19:21PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 01:53:13 +0200, Alfons Adriaensen wrote:
> >
> > > If the GUI is in a separate process and connected by e.g. OSC, it
> > > could as well be on a machine that doesn't have the plugin files.
> > > Or that has a different version of them (for perfectly good reasons).
> > > To ensure consistency the GUI should get its plugin descriptions from
> > > the host anyway. This works even with POL (Plain Old Ladspa).
> >
> > True enough, but with POL if the frontend and backend mahcines are different
> > architectures or operating systems then you have a problem.
>
> If send the raw binary data, yes, that's Inviting Trouble (IT).
> But if it's correctly OSC encoded there shouldn't be a problem.
> Anyway I guess a host would not use the raw LADSPA data, but a
> rather a more general format that it could use to describe its
> internal modules or other plugin formats as well. The GUI doesn't
> need to know if a module is built-in, LADSPA, LV2, or any other
> format. One more reason for not having it read the LV2 itself.

As the author of such a host, I can tell you it's definitely an absolute
godsend to be able to have the client read the data file directly.

-DR-
Received on Tue Jun 27 08:15:02 2006

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jun 27 2006 - 08:15:02 EEST