On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 08:46:42AM -0400, Forest Bond wrote:
> > The issue here is that Mr Bond wants a sampler like Kontakt that works
> > with Linux audio systems and saves its state. The best way to achieve
> > that is to work on a free alternative, eg, Linux Sampler.
>
> In any case, Linux Sampler and Kontakt are
> different sorts of samplers at this point. Linux Sampler is more in the spirit
> of Gigasampler, and Kontakt is more like an emulation of a hardware sampler (but
> vastly more flexible).
The key words there are "at this point." As noted, the *long-term*
potential of Linux Sampler is probably still much greater than Kontakt-in-wine.
> > Forest, you might reconsider your decision that fst has the most
> > long-term potential and check out Linux Sampler instead; specifically
> > QSampler.
>
> Noted. However, I remain unconvinced that Linux Sampler is intended to be a
> drop-in replacement for something like Kontakt.
I don't think it's intended to be a drop-in replacement for Kontakt; I
think it's just intended to be cool.
Bob
Received on Fri Jun 30 20:15:09 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jun 30 2006 - 20:15:09 EEST