On Sat, 2006-07-01 at 17:43 +0200, Luis Garrido wrote:
> As defined by the FSF, no, it is not free software. If you use the
> freebeerian definition, "you don't have to pay its authors to use it",
> yes, it is.
>
In the Linux world "free software" means free as in speech. No one uses
"free software" to refer to closed source software that's given away for
free.
Lee
Received on Sat Jul 1 20:15:03 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jul 01 2006 - 20:15:03 EEST