Hi,
Steve Harris wrote:
> miseed the orignal posting, but went back i the archives and found it]
>
> This is kinda interesting, but it's slightly peverse as some ofthe results
> can be got by looking at the source! Though it's good to confirm what the
> results actually are.
>
>
I know... I've been meaning to look at the sources for a while, but
haven't done it yet...
> Like Fons I'm a bit concerned about the tests, 0dB square wave in
> particular is worrying.
>
>
I'm curious as to why it is worrying. I'm not expecting the square waves
to yield particularly important results, but I'm interested to know why
it seems such a bad idea.
> The point about latency is interesting. I did consider delaying the input
> in the SC* plugins, but I guess that analogue compressors likly didn't
> have it, and they're often considered to be the best so it can't be too
> important.
>
>
> Have you measureued the systemic delay of the waves compressor to verify
> that it does have a delay line?
>
>
I tried... but there's no way to turn delay compensation off for plugins
in Sonar, either in DX or VST versions... So there probably is some
delay, but I have no way of finding out how much. It's specially hard
for Waves plugins since they use a rare waveshell which is not
compatible with most simple hosts. Do waves plugins work with xfst?
Cheers,
Andrés
> - Steve
>
>
Received on Fri Oct 6 08:15:01 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 06 2006 - 08:15:01 EEST