On Saturday 27 January 2007 06:47, Loki Davison wrote:
> On 1/27/07, Fraser <fraser@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I've been converting my old VST plugins over to LADSPA and have come
> > across something in the api which I really miss - the inability separate
> > the algorithmic to the displayed value of a parameter.
> > I'm finding this inability is leading to non-ideal programming habits.
>
> why are you coding new stuff for a depreciated system? Why not LV2?
And why should you code for a plugin standard that nothing supports?
Besides, is LV2 even finished?
Suggesting that LADSPA is deprecated is a bit of a stretch. It may not be
perfect, but it's well supported.
/Robert
> It's extensible so if anything is missing you can add it.
> http://lv2plug.in/
>
> Loki
>
> p.s.
>
> hiking in yunnan / tibet border area is pretty awesome!
Received on Sat Jan 27 16:15:02 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 27 2007 - 16:15:02 EET