Robert Jonsson <rj@email-addr-hidden> writes:
> On Saturday 27 January 2007 06:47, Loki Davison wrote:
>> On 1/27/07, Fraser <fraser@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > I've been converting my old VST plugins over to LADSPA and have come
>> > across something in the api which I really miss - the inability separate
>> > the algorithmic to the displayed value of a parameter.
>> > I'm finding this inability is leading to non-ideal programming habits.
>>
>> why are you coding new stuff for a depreciated system? Why not LV2?
>
> And why should you code for a plugin standard that nothing supports?
> Besides, is LV2 even finished?
> Suggesting that LADSPA is deprecated is a bit of a stretch. It may not be
> perfect, but it's well supported.
>
nothing? i'm aware of 3 hosts that can host lv2 plugins. maybe there are
others i'm not aware of.
-- Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jan 28 2007 - 00:15:03 EET