>
> Personally, I'd rather see the effort go towards making LV2 a real,
> workable standard with all the important features (presets, host tempo
> sync, MIDI handling/processing) that some of the other standards have.
>
>
count me in, I prefer putting developer time into creation and
communication of native formats like LADSPA/DSSI and LV2 over supporting
proprietary closed formats.
Communication means telling the world that there are some plugins for
Linux too. When I look on KVRAudio I see nearly nothing in the Linux
entrys and submitted immediately Ardour as a host which was missing too,
a shame because its an important plus for Linux as musicplatform.
Problem is that the kids watch that site to see whats going on and what
is available and perceive Linux kinda lame for audio, missing the fact
that there are several standalone synths so plugins are not so
necessary. Of course there are the Linux audio pages and they are good
for us, but the kids living elsewhere although I think an slight
interest is there, especially with all the inherent problems of Windows
Vista.
Why bother with the kids? To get a critical mass so the driver situation
gets improved, that are my selfish motives.
I am about to create some DSSI Synths. I wanted to share some pd patches
which act and sound very well as multipurpose synths (as the opposite as
very specialized patches which are good only for 1 song) but find it
hard to 'distribute' because they depend on some externals which might
be not available, to complicate for instant gratification. So I prefer
now a self contained format. More soon here or on LAU list...
Cheers,
Malte
-- Malte Steiner media art + development -www.block4.com-Received on Thu Feb 15 00:15:02 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 15 2007 - 00:15:03 EET