On 3/1/07, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki <eric@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 05:41:49PM +0100, Robin Gareus wrote:
> > he might be right. a random bot is more likely to spam
> > user@email-addr-hidden than linux-audio-user@...
> >
> > a compromise woud be la-user, la-dev , la-ann -
> > or user-ml@.. (mailing-list), etc. (but that's not catchy enough)
>
> or lad, lau, laa as many of us tend to refer to them colloquially.
This solution is far too obvious. My brain simply refuses to consider this.
;-)
More seriously, I also thought of those. But lad@email-addr-hidden may
raise the same problems as user@email-addr-hidden (at least for
dictionary based random spam if such a thing exists, and I have no
doubt it does).
Thought I admit that the most obvious alias for these lists would be
lad, lau and laa.
__________________
Marc-Olivier Barre,
Markinoko.
Received on Fri Mar 2 00:15:02 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 02 2007 - 00:15:02 EET