On 3/1/07, Robin Gareus <robin@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> he might be right. a random bot is more likely to spam
> user@email-addr-hidden than linux-audio-user@...
Ok, right...
> a compromise woud be la-user, la-dev , la-ann -
> or user-ml@.. (mailing-list), etc. (but that's not catchy enough)
Agreed
> I'd suggest to alias the other way round:
> if dev@email-addr-hidden is Spammed, you can announce and drop this feature
> again while everyone with "linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden" in their
> address book won't ever notice.
If I understand you well, it means making dev@email-addr-hidden an alias
(that can be dropped if causing too much issues) right ?
> in short term dev@.. will have less SPAM than linux-audio-dev, and in
> the long-run SpamAssassin will mark dup.-postings in blacklists..
Well, to be honest ATM there seems to be no spam on linux-audio-dev to
be moderated and none received in my mailbox (from lad). It has always
surprised me.
> OTOH; with dev@email-addr-hidden - we'd benefit from a shorter subject! [la-dev]
> compared to [linux-audio-dev] - there are usually < 50 chars for subject
> in a 80x24 terminal :) - for email shortcuts there is an addressbook and
> personally I use "LAD" as nick for it.
Prefix for the subject line can be changed. It's the subject_prefix
parameter. we could make it [LAD], [LAU] and [LAA] (that's the
shortest I can think of and it would make terminal users happy).
__________________
Marc-Olivier Barre,
Markinoko.
Received on Fri Mar 2 00:15:02 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 02 2007 - 00:15:02 EET